Module 2

Session 1

Caram, C. (2001). The best-kept secret in at-risk education. Kappa Delta Pi, 37(2), 70-73.

Krovetz, M. (1999) . Building resiliency: Expecting all students to use their minds and hearts well. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(2), 56-60.

Vann, M, Schubert, S., & Rogers D. (2000). The Big Bayou Association: An alternative education program for middle-school, at-risk juveniles. Preventing School Failure, 45(1), 31-36.

| Top of Section | Top of Page |

Session 2

Covey, S. (1989). The habits of highly effective people. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Glasser, W. (1986). Choice theory in the classroom. New York: Harper & Row.

Rosenshine, B.(1979). Content, time, and direct instruction. In P. Peterson & H. Walberg (Eds.) Research on teaching: Concepts, findings, and implications. Berkeley, CA: McCutchen.

Walker, H. & Bullis, M. (1995). A comprehensive services model for troubled youth. In C. M. Nelson, R. B. Rutherford, Jr. & Wolford, B. (Eds.) Comprehensive and collaborative systems that work for troubled youth: A national agenda. Unpublished manuscript. National Coalition for Juvenile Justice Services, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY.

| Top of Section | Top of Page |

Session 3

Black, S. (1997). One last chance. The American School Board Journal, 184(5), 40-42.

Braddock, J., and McPartland, J. (1993). Education of early adolescents. Review of Research in Education, 19, 135-170.

Cox, S., Davidson, W., and Bynum, T., (1995). A meta-analytic assessment of delinquency-related outcomes of alternative education programs. Crime and Delinquency, 41, 219-234.

Cummins, K. (1995). Boot camps: Still only a "half-baked" delinquency cure. Youth Today, 14, 16-17.

Raywid, M. (1994). Synthesis of research: Alternative schools: The state of the art. Educational Leadership, 52(1), 26-31.

Smith, G., Gregory, T., & Pugh, R. (1981). Meeting student needs: Evidence of the superiority of alternative schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 62(8), 561-564.

Willis, S. (1996). Managing today's classroom: Finding alternatives to control and compliance. Education Update, 38(6), 1, 37.

| Top of Section | Top of Page |

Session 4

Giles, R. (1998). At-risk students can succeed: A model program that meets special needs. Schools in the Middle, 6, 18-20.

Kallio, B. & Sanders, E. (1999). An alternative school collaboration model. American Secondary Education, 28(2), 27-36.

Leone, P. (1997). The school as a caring community: Proactive discipline and exceptional children, In J. Paul et al (Eds.) Special education practice: Applying the knowledge, affirming the values, and creating the future. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.

Robinson, T. & Rapport, M. (1999). Providing special education in the juvenile justice system. Remedial and Special Education, 20(1), 19-26.

Weisstein, E. (2001). A high school diploma-and more. Educational Leadership, 58(6), 73-77.

| Top of Section | Top of Page |

Session 5

Billig, S. (2000). Research on K-12 school-based service-learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(9), 658-664.

Jennings, M. (2001). Two very special service-learning projects. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(6), 474-475.

Muscott, H. (2000). A review and analysis of service-learning programs involving students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 23(3), 346-368.

National Service-Learning Cooperative (1998). Essential elements of service learning. St. Paul, MN: National Youth Leadership Council.

Sigmon, R. (1994). Serving to learn, learning to serve. Linking service with learning. Chicago: National Institute on Learning and Service.

| Top of Section | Top of Page |

Session 6

Armstrong, T. (1998). Awakening genius in the classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Gardner, H. (1985). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

Follansbee, S., Hughes, R., Pisha, B., & Stahl, S. (1997). Can online communications improve student performance? Results of a controlled study. ERS Spectrum, 15 (1), 15-26.

Meyer, A., O'Neill, L. (2000). Beyond access: Universal Design for Learning. Exceptional Parent, 30(3), 59-61.

Meyer, A., O'Neill, L. (2000). Tools and materials that support the learning brain. Exceptional Parent, 30(5), 60-62.

O'Neill, L. (2000). Computer technology can empower students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Parent, 30(7), 72-74.

O'Neill, L. (2000). Seeing past a child's disability: One parent's view of Universal Design for Learning . Exceptional Parent, 3 (11), 26-32.

O'Neill, L. (2000). Moving toward the vision of the universally designed classroom. Exceptional Parent, 30 (9), 52-56.

Orkwis, R. and McLane, K. (1998). A curriculum every student can use: Design principles for access. ERIC/OSEP Topical Brief. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.

Rose, D., & Meyer, A. (1996). Expanding the literacy toolbox (Literacy Research Paper 11). New York: Scholastic.

Rose, D. & Meyer, A. (2000). Universal design for individual differences. Educational
Leadership, 58 (3), 39-43.

Rose, D. & Meyer, A. (2000). Universal Design for Learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15 (1), 67-70.

Rose, D., Sethuraman, S. & Meo, G. (2000). Universal Design for Learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(2), 56-60.

Silver, H., Strong, R., & Perini, M. (2000). So each may learn: Integrating learning styles and multiple intelligences. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Teele, S. (2000). Rainbows of intelligence: Exploring how students learn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

| Top of Section | Top of Page |