|
|
|
Module
9
Session One
*ERIC
digest of measurement terms. (1989). Educational Resources Information
Center (ERIC), Office of Educational Research
and Improvement (OERI), U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC. Available online: http://ericae.net/edo/ed315430.htm. Messick, S.(1996).Validity of performance.
In Philips, G.(1996). Technical issues in large-scale performance assessment. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics. Overton, T.(2003). Assessing learners
with special needs: An applied approach (4th. ed.). New
Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall. *Rudman, Herbert C. (1989). Integrating
testing with teaching. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation,
1(6). Available online: http://ericae.net/pare/getvn.asp?v=1&n=6.
*Ruder, L., & Schafer, W. (2002).
What teachers need to know about assessment. Washington,
DC: National Education Association. Available online: http://ericae.net/books/nea Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J.(1995).
Assessment in special and remedial education (6th
ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Standards for educational and psychological
testing (1999). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association,
American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement
in Education. Session TwoMamlin, M.
The dreaded behavioral objective.
Available online:http://www1.appstate.edu/~mamlinnl/behavior.htm. Mercer, C., & Mercer, A. (2001). Teaching students
with learning problems (6th
ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill. *Ruder, L., & Schafer, W. (2002). What teachers need
to know about assessment. Washington, DC:
National Education Association.
Available online: http://ericae.net/books/nea/ *Wright, J.
(2002). Curriculum-based
assessment manual. New Jersey:
Intervention Central
Available online: http://www.interventioncentral.org. Session ThreeBrazorsport College.
Improving your objective test-taking skills. Available online: http://gator1.brazosport.cc.tx.us/~lac/objtest.htm. *Boyd, Ronald T. C. (1988). Improving
your test-taking skills. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 1(2).
Available online: http://ericae.net/pare/getvn.asp?v=1&n=2.
Carman, R.A., & Adams, W.R. (1972). Study skills:
A Studentsí guide for survival.
New York: Wiley. Deshler, D., Ellis, E. , & Lenz,
K. (1996). Teaching
adolescents with learning disabilities
(2nd ed.). Denver,
CO: Love Publishing. *Eissenberg, Thomas E. & Rudner,
Lawrence M. (1988). Explaining test results to parents.
Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 1(1). Available
online: http://ericae.net/pare/getvn.asp?v=1&n=1. Hughes, C. A., Schumaker, J.B., Deshler,
D.D., & Mercer, D.D. (1988). The test-taking strategy.
Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises. *Ruder, L., & Schafer, W. (2002). What teachers need
to know about assessment. Washington, DC: National Education Association. Available online: http://ericae.net/books/nea/. Southwestern Academic Services. (2002). Test taking strategies. Available
online: www.southwestern.edu/academic/acser-skills-teststr.html Tennessee
Department of Education. (2002). Test strategies for students, parents, and
teachers. Available online: http://www.state.tn.us/education/tsteststrategies.htm University of South Carolina. (2002). Writing essay type examination. Available online:
www.history.ohio-state.edu/essayexm.htm.
Session Four*Ruder, L., & Schafer, W. (2002). What teachers need
to know about assessment. Washington, DC:
National Education Association.
Available online: http://ericae.net/books/nea/. *Council for Exceptional Children. (1998). IDEAs
definitions of disabilities. Reston, VA:
ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. Available online:
http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed429396.html. Landau, J., Vohs, J., Romano, C. (2002). All kids count.
Boston, MA: Parents Engaged in Education
Reform (PEER Project). Available online: http://www.ldonline.org/ld_indepth/special_educator/peer_assessment.html. *Thurlow, M., & Bolt, S. (2001). Empirical support for accommodations most
often allowed in state policy (Synthesis Report
41). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
Available online:
http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis41.html. *Thurlow, M., Olsen, K., Elliott, J.,
Ysseldyke, J., Erickson, R., & Aherarn, E.
(1996). Alternate assessments for students with
disabilities for students unable to participate in general large-scale
assessments (Policy Directions No. 5).
Minneapolis, MN: University
of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
Available online: http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Policy5.html *Thurlow, M., Quenemoen, R., Thompson,
S., & Lehr, C. (2001). Principles and characteristics of inclusive assessment and accountability
systems. (Synthesis Report 40).
Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on
Educational Outcomes. Available online:
http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis40.html. *Ysseldyke, J.E., & Olsen, K.R. (1997). Putting
alternative assessments into practice: What
measures and possible sources of data (Synthesis Report No. 28).
Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on
Educational Outcomes. Available
online: http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OlinePubs/Synthesis28.htm.
Session
Five Center for Universal Design. Available online: http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/index.html.
Code of Fair Testing Practices in Education.
(2002). Washington, DC: Joint Committee on Testing
Practices. (Mailing Address: Joint Committee on Testing Practices, Science
Directorate, American Psychological Association, 750 First Street, NE,
Washington, DC 20002-4242; http://www.apa.org/science/jctpweb.html). *Liu, K., Anderson, M.E., Swierzbin,
B., & Thurlow, M. (1999). Bilingual accommodations
for limited English proficient students on statewide reading tests:
Phase 1 (Minnesota Report No. 20). Minneapolis, MN: University of
Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Available online: http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/MnReport20.html. *National Center on Educational Outcomes.
Special topic area: Universally
designed assessments. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
Available
online: http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/TopicAreas/UnivDesign/UnivDesign_Resources.htm. *Thompson, S.J., Johnstone, C.J., &
Thurlow, M.L. (2002). Universal
design applied to large scale assessments (Synthesis Report 44).
Minneapolis, MN: University
of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Available online: http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/MnReport20.html.
*The instructor and/or the students
should download these materials. They
are excellent resources. The
instructor can use these materials to prepare the presentation.
Students can use these materials as reading resources. |
|
|