Resiliency and Adolescents
at Risk:
Reconceptualizing Schools As Communities
The Four Components of Resiliency
Marty Krovetz, Ph.D.
Department of Educational Leadership
San Jose State University
~ Module 14, Session 1~
Lecture Notes
MarÌa is saying a lot about the relationship she has with adults at her school. She is saying that she feels welcome and safe at the school. Of equal importance, she feels valued, respected and known by the adults at the school. Potential Of All Students
Resiliency
This is not a simple fix!
Children spend approximately 15,000 hours in K-12 schooling. Michael Rutter (1979) asked whether a childís experiences at school have any effect. Does it matter which school the student attends? This question led Rutter to study twelve inner city London secondary schools in depth. He used four main measures of student outcomes: attendance, pupil behavior, examination success, and delinquency. His research indicates that the school attended did make a difference. He found that schools differed markedly in the behavior and attainment shown by their pupils, and schools that performed better on one of the four student outcomes generally performed better on the others. Caution: Resilience is a relative termFew people make it through childhood, adolescence and adulthood without many ups and downs. Everyone experiences periods of serious suffering. As Weissbound writes, ìchildren described as resilient are often simply children who have not yet encountered an environment that triggers their vulnerabilities.î (1996, p. 40) Nothing is fixed. Children who are in trouble at one point in their lives often right themselves at some later point. In fact, it is difficult to predict which children in high school will thrive as adults. Often, those selected as ìmost popularî and ìmost likely to succeedî in high school struggle as adults, while others who struggled socially as teenagers appear to adapt very successfully as adults. ìCan our students really meet our expectations for each of the six exhibitions for graduation?î ìWell, who are you concerned about?î ìHow about Jill? She is a special education student.î ìI work with Jill every day. She is doing well in all of her classes. She is coachable and is motivated. She will be intimidated at first, and sheíll need extra help, but if her advisor and I work closely with her, sheëll pass all exhibitions.î ìHow about Louisa? Her English language skills are still weak.î ìWeíve already agreed that students can do the oral part of the exhibitions in their primarily language as long as they do a major part of one in a second language. Louisa can choose to present in Spanish as long as one substantial presentation is in English. We have a rubric in place for second language.î ìYouíre right. Louisa will do fine.î ìHow about Jack?î ìJack is my advisee. We all know him well. He is lazy and a behavior problem, but capable. We will work with him and with his parents. Hopefully heíll choose to take this seriously in order to graduate. If he does, heíll do fine!î This discussion and ones like it take place regularly at Anzar High School. Anzar is a small, rural high school, founded on the principles of the Coalition of Essential Schools. Due to its small size and its commitment to a strong student advisory program, all students are known well by teachers. Conversations like this one occur often and typically involve the entire staff. The conversation above included comments from six teachers. Definitions Resiliency - the ability to bounce back successfully despite exposure to severe risks. (Benard, l993, p. 44) Resilient community - a community that is focused on the protective factors that foster resiliency for its members: (1) caring, (2) high expectations and purposeful support, and (3) ongoing opportunities for meaningful participation. Schools, in general, are terrible at being resilient communities. Most schools and most classes are too large and the school day too harried for teachers or administrators to know each student well and therefore to care deeply about each student, to set high expectations, to offer purposeful support, and to value the participation of each student. Children have a need for social affiliation and, in most cases, choose peer relationships that are constructive rather than destructive. Richard Weissbourd writes (1996) that childrenís peer groups tend to become destructive when children lack a basic ingredient of healthy growth: positive sources of recognition, especially meaningful opportunities that extend into relations with adults. Children have to believe that they can create a better life. If they have this belief, they will strive. Without the perception of meaningful opportunities, children have less reason to be afraid of the repercussions of their destructive behavior. |
Copyright©2004, San José State University